Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Theses Online London School of Economics web site

Normative dimensions of the practice of private law

Akbari, Sina (2022) Normative dimensions of the practice of private law. PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science.

[img] Text - Submitted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 15 March 2025.

Download (1MB)
Identification Number: 10.21953/lse.00004669

Abstract

This thesis is an examination of and critical reflection on theoretical approaches in private law theory. First, because private law is a subset of the general category of law, I consider how debates in general jurisprudence around explanatory, descriptive and normative theories about the law can shed light on similar projects in private law. This includes a critical analysis of ‘interpretive’ theories which purport to explain and justify at the same time. Second, because normative theorizing around private law touches on questions of justice and rights, I consider how recent debates in political philosophy may have a bearing on private law. In this respect I highlight the distinction drawn between ‘moralist’ and ‘realist’ approaches to normative political philosophy. I argue that the existing private law theory literature takes a moralistic approach and show what political realism would have to say about private law theory. On a realist view, political philosophy must take moral disagreement as a starting point, and rather than trying to resolve it, it must proceed with this disagreement in mind. Political realism reframes our question from the moralist one of “What rights and obligations structure the legal relationship between private persons?” to the realist one of “How do we act together in the face of disagreement over the question of what rights and obligations structure the legal relationship between private persons?” This focuses our normative inquiry on institutions designed to allow us to coexist in the face of disagreements over private rights and obligations. Further, it shifts our analysis from questions of justice (about which there is irresolvable disagreement) to questions of legitimacy.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Additional Information: © 2022 Sina Akbari
Library of Congress subject classification: K Law > K Law (General)
Sets: Departments > Law
Supervisor: Voyiakis, Emmanuel and Webb, Charlie
URI: http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/4669

Actions (login required)

Record administration - authorised staff only Record administration - authorised staff only

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics